Our positions and statements

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

Satellite mega-constellations

Mega-constellations, also known as low earth-orbit (LEO) satellite constellations, are webs of networked satellites that orbit the Earth at altitudes of 2,000 km or less, providing global telecommunications services. The brightness and frequency of the objects have caused concern among the astronomy community and the general public.

The sheer number of satellites, combined with the brightness of the objects and the frequency of sightings, is a serious threat to the dark sky community. Astronomers, astrophotographers, and stargazers have all shared concerns about satellite mega-constellations polluting the night sky.

DarkSky is especially concerned about the threats that satellite mega-constellations pose to International Dark Sky Places. These places have taken measures to protect natural darkness, and offer millions of people around the globe the opportunity to observe the splendor of the night sky.

By the end of 2030, it’s projected that 50,000 satellites will be in low Earth orbit — a 2,400% increase in a single decade. The reflected light from these satellite swarms may increase the night sky’s brightness by 250% — erasing 50% of all stars from view.

Simulations also show that without mitigation, approximately one out of every fifteen points of light in the night sky will be a satellite. This would fundamentally alter the night sky so that for the first time in history, we would see more human-made patterns in the sky than we would see the stars.

DarkSky’s five principles to preserve the quiet enjoyment of the night sky and protect the general public from the impacts of satellite mega-constellations are:

1. Stewardship of the night sky is a shared responsibility that requires participation and consultation with all stakeholders.
2. The cumulative impact on night sky brightness attributed to satellites does not exceed 10 percent above natural background levels.
3. Maintained satellite brightness is below the threshold for detection by the unaided eye.
4. Satellite visibility is an unusual occurrence.
5. Launch schedules and orbital parameters are publicly available in advance.

Adopted January 2020; amended September 2021

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

Outdoor sports and stadium lighting

In recent years, we’ve witnessed a marked increase in the number of outdoor sports lighting complexes built in urban and suburban neighborhoods. These facilities are constructed at schools, parks, and neighborhood complexes. The excessive amount of light associated with these complexes can be a nuisance for neighborhoods and create significant environmental impacts.

Recognizing the urgent need for leadership to encourage and promote community-friendly sports lighting designs, the DarkSky Technical Committee released the following criteria:

By adopting DarkSky’s Community-Friendly Outdoor Sports Lighting (OSL) program guidelines, your community will:

• Minimize neighborhood lighting nuisance by greatly reducing local spill and glare.
• Manage high angle light pollution, thus dramatically decreasing off-site light trespass and sky glow.
• Mitigate neighborhood light pollution and sky glow, which will benefit the environment, the astronomy community, and others impacted by poorly designed outdoor sports facilities.
• Minimize lumen densities, thereby reducing energy consumption.

Adopted March 2018

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

Correlated color temperature (CCT) and short-wavelength (blue) light

With the increasingly widespread use of white light-emitting diodes (LEDs), DarkSky is concerned about the potential negative effects of blue-rich white light, even from fixtures with proper shielding. In 2010, we published a white paper outlining the potential hazards of blue-rich white light sources. Since then the scientific evidence has solidified around its conclusions.

The case against blue light is well founded with regard to discomfort, glare, circadian rhythm disruption in humans, light scattering, sky glow, and biological system disruption in wildlife. Outdoor lighting with high blue-light content is more likely to contribute to light pollution because it has a significantly larger geographic and atmospheric reach than lighting with less blue light. In natural settings, blue light at night has been shown to adversely affect wildlife behavior and reproduction. This is true even in cities, which are often stopover points for migratory species.

In 2014, the DarkSky Approved Lighting program (then known as the Fixture Seal of Approval) updated our certification standard to require that certified lighting have a correlated color temperature (CCT) no higher than 3000 K (up to 3220 K actual measured value — ANSI C78.377). DarkSky seeks the best possible scenario for new LED installations and retrofits to: 1) replace old technology without increasing light output; 2) minimize short-wavelength emissions; and 3) decrease operational costs and energy consumption.

We promote environmentally responsible outdoor lighting; support the research, development, and adoption of new technologies; and encourage the lighting industry to continue the march toward lower-CCT lighting products with less short-wavelength emission.

Adopted 2014, amended in 2016

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

High-powered lights along the U.S.-Mexico border

In the United States, few locations remain where the night is naturally dark. One of these is stretches forms part of the border between the United States and Mexico. In April 2022, the Greater Big Bend International Dark Sky Reserve, which straddles the U.S.-Mexico border, was certified in recognition of decades of work to protect its dark skies.

Today, high-power stadium lights threaten some of these last dark places. Recognizing this, DarkSky’s Board of Directors recently reviewed the situation and adopted the following  position:

• To oppose the installation of any future permanent lighting systems in stretches of the borderlands that would qualify for protection under the International Dark Sky Places program by way of their sky quality.
• To urge the Federal Government to decommission, disable, or otherwise ensure that the installed lights are not turned on.

This decision relates solely to the installation and use of light, not the overall border wall project.

Adopted July 2022 (read more in the blog post).

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

Light justice

Access to a naturally dark sky and quality lighting are not a privilege but a right of all people. Light pollution impacts low-income communities disproportionately — and has only recently been recognized as an environmental justice issue, despite a troubling history. Harsh, inappropriate lighting affects quality of life and robs communities of their connection to the cosmos. Unfortunately, inappropriate lighting is widely used by municipalities and housing developments under the guise of safety. Light justice is as much about access to responsible, community-friendly lighting as it is about access to the pure night sky.

Our work to promote light justice starts from within. Recognizing that this effort is a marathon and not a sprint, our team has worked over the last year to look inward through the lens of inclusion, diversity, equity, and access (IDEA). With expert guidance, DarkSky’s team collectively revisited its purpose, vision, and core values to include robust and direct language addressing IDEA principles.

Adopted July 2021

DARKSKY POSITION STATEMENT

Electronic billboards

Electronic billboards (a.k.a. electronic message centers, or EMCs) can be up to ten times brighter at night than traditionally lit billboards and can be harmful to the nighttime environment. LED light emitted from EMCs cannot be shielded, so the light floods into the night sky, which wastes energy and contributes to light pollution. Light from EMCs can cause glare and be a dangerous distraction to drivers. In some cases, EMC light can be visible from long distances and may affect the breeding, foraging, and orientation behaviors of nocturnal wildlife.

However, when installed and operated in accordance with DarkSky’s guidance for electronic message centers, EMCs replacing traditionally floodlight-illuminated billboards can actually create a net reduction in sky brightness.

The DarkSky Technical Committee developed EMC Guidelines (PDF) to provide planners, lighting designers, architects, biologists, government officials, and the general public with solutions for EMCs, both on and off premises, that minimize harm to the natural night and even reduce sky brightness when replacing inappropriately lit signs and billboards.

The guidelines …

• Recommend best practices for the amount of light emitted by electronic billboards and signs for urban, suburban, and rural areas
• Recommend curfews for when signs and billboards should be turned off
• Identify best management practices to decrease or eliminate negative impacts on the environment, reduce visual clutter, and improve safety for drivers and pedestrians

Adopted January 2019

DARKSKY Organizational STATEMENT

Reflect Orbital and threats posed by orbital illumination systems

Reflect Orbital, a planned orbital illumination system, proposes to use in-space mirrors mounted on satellites to reflect sunlight down to Earth at night. The company has described the capability to provide “sunlight on demand” through satellite constellations designed to illuminate areas up to 5 kilometers wide at intensities between 0.8 and 2.3 lux—several times brighter than a full moon. To achieve these levels, multiple satellites would be required for each target area, with illumination lasting only a few minutes as satellites pass overhead. Reflect Orbital has outlined plans for thousands of satellites and is seeking FCC approval to launch its first prototypes in 2026.

Orbital illumination systems represent an unprecedented environmental intervention. Based on current scientific evidence, DarkSky does not see a viable pathway for such systems to align with responsible lighting principles or with our mission to protect natural darkness. These systems would introduce significant ecological, human health, safety, and astronomical risks at a global scale.

1. Environmental degradation: Artificial light from orbital illumination would introduce a powerful new stressor to nocturnal ecosystems. Research shows that even low levels of artificial light at night disrupt essential behaviors such as navigation, migration, feeding, and reproduction across hundreds of species. These disruptions can destabilize food webs and accelerate biodiversity loss.
2. Impacts on human wellbeing: Exposure to artificial light at night disrupts circadian rhythms that regulate sleep, metabolic processes, and hormonal cycles. Research links circadian disruption to a growing number of health concerns. Reflected orbital illumination viewed through optical devices may also pose a risk of eye damage, similar to observing a partial solar eclipse.
3. Threats to public safety: Moving beams of light from space-based mirrors could create sudden flashes, glare, or sweeping illumination patterns if systems malfunction or mirrors fail to stow. These effects pose risks to night vision, aircraft operations, drivers, and observers using binoculars or telescopes.
4. Impacts on astronomical research: Scattered light from orbital illuminators would significantly increase skyglow and degrade ground-based astronomical observations. A constellation of such satellites would create persistent interference, and a direct beam near observatories could damage sensitive instruments.
5. Orbital debris hazards: Large mirrors in low Earth orbit would face high rates of micro-impacts and increase collision and debris-generation risks, adding to an already crowded orbital environment.

DarkSky’s work is guided by the Five Principles of Responsible Outdoor Lighting at Night, which call for lighting that is necessary, targeted, low-level, and well-controlled. Orbital illumination systems fundamentally conflict with these principles.

Given the documented risks, DarkSky opposes Reflect Orbital’s proposed project as currently conceived. Consistent with our position on satellite mega-constellations, we urge the FCC to close longstanding regulatory gaps that allow satellite deployments to proceed without environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

We also call on Reflect Orbital to demonstrate leadership by voluntarily commissioning a comprehensive, independent environmental impact assessment conducted by qualified experts—regardless of whether such review is required by the FCC. Technologies with global environmental implications demand transparency and rigorous evaluation before deployment.

We remain committed to scientific dialogue and transparency. The burden of proof rests with the operator to demonstrate that their system will not cause environmental or public harm, and a full, independent assessment is the necessary first step.

Published December 2025